Fix typos, make it live
This commit is contained in:
parent
5fdd21f3ed
commit
ed0dad8d48
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
- file: posts/drop-conduits-finalizers.md
|
||||
title: "Drop Conduit's Finalizers?"
|
||||
time: 2018-01-04T11:00:00Z
|
||||
time: 2018-01-03T13:57:00Z
|
||||
description: "Time to ask a really hard question: is it time to remove Conduit's finalizer concept from the library?"
|
||||
- file: posts/review-bridge-program.md
|
||||
title: Review of The Bridge strength program
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ is almost always fine in practice, but clearly not a mathematical law.
|
|||
relies on using the type paramter on the `Pipe` type to eliminate
|
||||
leftovers, but leftovers are not a topic I'm raising right now.
|
||||
|
||||
None of this is new information, so why am I writing this blog post
|
||||
now. The first is that I'm already working on a breaking changes to
|
||||
None of this is new information; so why am I writing this blog post
|
||||
now? The first is that I'm already working on a breaking change to
|
||||
Conduit to standardize naming and eliminate some legacy type and
|
||||
operator names. See
|
||||
[the discussion](https://github.com/snoyberg/conduit/issues/283) and
|
||||
[initial comparison](https://github.com/snoyberg/conduit/pull/338/files)
|
||||
for more details. This natural leads me to ask related questions.
|
||||
for more details. This naturally leads me to ask related questions.
|
||||
|
||||
More to the point: after having worked with Conduit for years, my
|
||||
initial concerns about prompt finalization seem to have been
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue