Better comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
8033936b61
commit
ac769474f6
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -298,6 +298,11 @@ I haven't even tested if this modified mandelbrot is symetric relatively to the
|
||||||
> inverseHeight (x,y,z,c) = (x,-y,z,c)
|
> inverseHeight (x,y,z,c) = (x,-y,z,c)
|
||||||
> inverseDepth (x,y,z,c) = (x,y,-z+1/deep,c)
|
> inverseDepth (x,y,z,c) = (x,y,-z+1/deep,c)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I cheat by making these symmetry.
|
||||||
|
But it is faster and render a nice form.
|
||||||
|
For this tutorial it will be good enough.
|
||||||
|
Also, the dichotomic method I use is mostly right but false for some cases.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The rest of the program is very close to the preceeding one.
|
The rest of the program is very close to the preceeding one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<div style="display:none">
|
<div style="display:none">
|
||||||
|
@ -342,5 +347,5 @@ And here is the result (if you use 500 for `nbDetails`):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
blogimage("mandelbrot_3D.png","A 3D mandelbrot like")
|
blogimage("mandelbrot_3D.png","A 3D mandelbrot like")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This is nice. But let's take a very high level look at our code:
|
This image is quite nice.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue