journal/2020-11-26--10-11-23Z--meta_rfc_for_dev_team.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
f11bab6f41
commit
d88bfbf0c1
1 changed files with 10 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Describe the objective of this RFC.
|
|||
+ pros
|
||||
+ cons
|
||||
|
||||
**** Considerations
|
||||
**** Furter Considerations and Remarks
|
||||
|
||||
Generic place to put comment not suitable in any other subsection.
|
||||
Typically, we could add
|
||||
|
@ -98,11 +98,14 @@ Typically, we could add
|
|||
+ Security
|
||||
+ Communication
|
||||
|
||||
** Considerations
|
||||
** Further Considerations and Remarks
|
||||
|
||||
*** =dev= label
|
||||
|
||||
Here are my proposed templates.
|
||||
We already have a =dev= label we should probably use for RFC meaningful
|
||||
only for developpers, and we should continu to use the =Epic= label for
|
||||
issues whose goal is the provide a spcecification document that we could
|
||||
give to Managers with an Execution Plan.
|
||||
We already have a =dev= label we should probably use for RFC whose audience
|
||||
is just the iroh team.
|
||||
|
||||
*** =Epic= label
|
||||
|
||||
We should continu to use the =Epic= label for issues whose goal is to
|
||||
produce a specification document along with an execution plan.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue