2022-06-30 07:56:38 +00:00
|
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
|
|
:ID: 509cbe3e-cf95-4bcd-9f61-9cc74aa35a8c
|
|
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
#+TITLE: Characteristics of Pseudoscience
|
|
|
|
#+Author: Yann Esposito
|
|
|
|
#+Date: [2022-06-30]
|
|
|
|
- tags ::
|
2022-06-30 07:57:39 +00:00
|
|
|
- source :: https://www.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/plvskm/a_guide_on_how_to_sniff_out_pseudoscience/
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 08:02:04 +00:00
|
|
|
* 11 points
|
2022-06-30 07:57:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 08:02:04 +00:00
|
|
|
1. Is *UNFALSIFIABLE* (can't be proven wrong): Makes vague or unobservable claims
|
|
|
|
2. Relies heavily on *ANECDOTES*, personal experiences, and testimonials
|
|
|
|
3. *CHERRY PICKS* confirming evidence while ignoring/minimizing disconfirming evidence
|
|
|
|
4. Uses *TECHNOBABBLE*: words that sound scientific but don't make sense
|
|
|
|
5. Lacks *PLAUSIBLE MECHANISM*: Now way to explain it based on existing knowledge
|
|
|
|
6. Is *UNCHANGING*: Doesn't self-correct or progress
|
|
|
|
7. Makes *EXTRAORDINARY/EXAGERATED CLAIMS* with insufficient evidence
|
|
|
|
8. Professes *CERTAINTY*: Talks of "proof", with great confidence
|
|
|
|
9. Commits *LOGICAL FALLACIES*: Arguments contain errors in reasoning
|
|
|
|
10. Lacks *PEER REVIEW*: Goes directly to the public, avoiding scientific scrutinity
|
|
|
|
11. Claims there's a *CONSPIRACY* to suppress their ideas
|