deft/notes/cisco_ft_securex_registration.org

308 lines
8.4 KiB
Org Mode
Raw Normal View History

:PROPERTIES:
:ID: 1208f09c-d37d-4e6b-9110-151f3c6b7d34
:END:
#+TITLE: Cisco FT SecureX Simplified Registration
#+Author: Yann Esposito
#+Date: [2021-12-07]
- tags :: [[id:299643a7-00e5-47fb-a987-3b9278e89da3][Auth]]
- source :: https://github.com/advthreat/response/issues/821
- dashboard :: https://github.com/advthreat/iroh/projects/32
* Functional Spec
Response issues:
- https://github.com/advthreat/response/issues/821
Figma: https://www.figma.com/file/Bz3m25kpWXpdct7AnhmNsW/SXSO-Registeration?node-id=759%3A5926
* Technical Plan
** Support private email vs public emails
/Estimate: 1 release cycles after the list is provided./
The solution is to use a blacklist of domains where any user could create
multiple email accounts pseudo-anonymously.
Details: https://github.com/advthreat/response/issues/979
*** Question is about where to put the list?
/Estimate: 1 release cycles depends on ops/
I suggest the list should be a single file in tenzin-config that should be
used on all environments.
*** Support allow-list exceptions for some Cisco user.
/Estimate: 1 release cycles after the list is provided./
Typically we should allow some users with an email like =some-user+XXX@gmail.com=
** Support, search admin with same email domain
/Estimate: 1 release cycle./
Note: *Work in progress*
We should be able given an email from a user, to find all the orgs for
which at least one of its admin has a matching domain name.
1. Most efficient: add an invisible field =email-domain= to all users. This
should be lower-case, and we will need a migration.
Doing this we could have a faster match than using string related queries.
Problems, users can login in the same user, with the same public email with
different emails.
This should be rare.
2. Search via text match.
The algorithm should look a bit like:
#+begin_src clojure
;; only when this is an unknown user
;; so a single approval will prevent the user to see this page.
(let [user-email ,,,
domain (string/replace user-email #".*@" "")
users (matching-admins domain) ;; returns a potentially big list of admin users
indexed-orgs (group-by :org-id users)]
(vals indexed-orgs))
#+end_src
Once this list of orgs is found.
We should also check the list of pending or rejected OrgAccessRequest for this user in
order to prevent the user to request access multiple time.
** Support Org request to admins
/Estimate: 4 release cycles/
We need to create another Entity for access request to an Org.
#+begin_src clojure
(s/defschema OrgAccessRequest
(st/merge
{:id UUID
:idp-mapping IdPMapping
:user-email s/Str
:org-id s/Str
:status (s/enum :pending :accepted :rejected)
:created-at DateTime}
(st/optional-keys
{:user-name s/Str
:user-nick s/Str
:approver-id UserId
:approver-email UserEmail ;; email of the approver
:updated-at DateTime
})))
#+end_src
When a user request access to an organization.
We should create this object in DB.
** Login Account Management Page
/Estimate: 4 release cycles/
See Figma: https://www.figma.com/file/Bz3m25kpWXpdct7AnhmNsW/SXSO-Registeration?node-id=759%3A5926
We should change the login flow, so the user might see an intermediate
/login account management page/.
On this /login account management page/ the user should see:
1. account selection
2. pending invites
3. matching orgs
To give an idea here is an example of what it will look like:
#+begin_src
Select Account:
- account-1
- account-2
Pending Invites:
- invite for org-1
- invite for org-2 (expired) [ask for renewal]
Matching Orgs:
- org-4
- org-5
#+end_src
*** Behavior
If the user is only part of 1 org, and has no invite, and not matching org.
He should not see that page and be redirected directly to his account.
If the user is only part of 1 org, and has matching org, it is not clear if
we should display that page?
If all other cases, the "login account management page"
Note also that if we have a pending invite on a matching email domain org.
The pending invite should take the priority when displaying the org.
**** Question
1. pending invite expired
2. matching org
What should we present the user?
1. renew invite (send an email to the inviter)
2. request access to the org
3. both 1 and 2
*** Technical details
When the user see this page, we know the =UserIdentity= only.
We should allow the user to create new =OrgAccessRequest=.
The way to do this is to create a new POST endpoint.
As the user will not have any JWT at this point.
We might probably build a "UserIdentity JWT" and trust it.
So the webpage could make request on behalf of a =UserIdentity= and not a =User=.
There should be an endpoint:
#+begin_src http
POST
/iroh/iroh-auth/request-org-access
Accept: application/json
Content-Type: application/json
User-Agent: ob-http
Authorization: Bearer ${user-identity-jwt}
{"org-id":"the-id-of-the-org-the-user-request-access-to"}
#+end_src
After this call the =user-identity-jwt= should contain enough data to retrieve:
- =idp-mapping=
- =user-email=
- all other metas, as user-name, user-nick, etc…
With this, and if every check matches:
1. There is a known active admin of this org with an email with the same domain name
2. The org is active
We should:
1. create a new =OrgAccessRequest= object in DB.
2. Send emails (see next section)
** Email Notification of Org Request Accesses
/Estimate: 4 release cycle after email+html templates/
1. List all the admins of the requested org.
2.a. If there is fewer admins than a number that could be configured in the
node configuration. Then we send an email to all admins.
2.b. If there are more admins than this specific number, then we randomly
chose this maximal number of admins and send them an email notification.
*TODO* Have an email template (both HTML and Text)
*** Notes
Need to be able to trigger a new request to join after 7 days.
** Org Requests CRUD API for Admins of the Orgs
/Estimate: 3 release cycle after mail templates + text/
There should be a CRUD API restricted to the ~admin/user-mgmt/org-requests~ scope:
- ~GET /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests~ list pending org access requests
- ~GET /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests/<id>~ read a single org access request
- ~POST /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests/<id>/accept~ Grant the access
- ~POST /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests/<id>/reject~ Reject the access
*** List
~GET /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests~
If no parameter is provided, only list pending =OrgAccessRequests= of the org
of the caller.
Otherwise we could pass the query-parameter =status= with the following
value(s):
- =pending=
- =accepted=
- =rejected=
Note we should probably support duplicate statuses.
Ex:
~GET /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests?status=accepted&status=pending~
*** Read
~GET /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests/org-request-id~
Should returns a 404 if not found or the single Org Access Request object.
*** Accept the Org Access
~POST /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests/<id>/accept~ Grant the access
The body should contain the role (either =admin= or =user=) with the following schema:
#+begin_src js
{"role":"admin"}
#+end_src
During the call, should:
1. Create a new user with:
#+begin_src clojure
{:user-id (gen-uuid)
:org-id (:org-id org-access-request)
:user-email (:user-email org-access-request)
:idp-mappings [(:idp-mapping org-access-request)]
:user-name (:user-name org-access-request)
:user-nick (:user-nick org-access-request)
:role (get-in request [:body :role])
:enabled? true
}
#+end_src
2. Send an email to user confirming his access was granted.
*TODO* have an email template + text.
*** Reject the Org Access
~POST /iroh/user-mgmt/org-requests/<id>/reject~ Reject the access
This call should update the =OrgAccessRequest= object by patching with:
#+begin_src clojure
{:udpated-at (now)
:approver-id (get-in req [:identity :user :id])
:approver-email (get-in req [:identity :user :email])
:status :rejected}
#+end_src
Then send an email to user confirming his access was denied.
*TODO* have an email template + text.
** UI Revamp.
/Estimate: 2 release cycle after email+html templates/
All the page shown during login are hosted in IROH.
So we should revamp all pages and we should probably, take great attention
to every shown webpage.
Typically, the look and feel is different for all pages. So we might
probably take care of the OAuth2 authorization pages as well as the error pages.
*TODO* have UI templates for every page of the workflow.
- https://github.com/advthreat/GLaDOS/issues/2667